OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC [OCUL]

Reporting date: 10/08/2025

⚠️ Neutral Insider Sale Detected

πŸ“ What Happened

  • Insider: Anderman Todd
  • Role: Chief Legal Officer
  • Company: OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC (OCUL)
  • Transaction Date(s): 2025-10-08
  • Table I (Non-Derivative Securities)
    • Sale : 11,132 shares
    • Average Sale Price: $12.34
    • Total Value: $137,368.88
    • Post-Transaction Direct Holdings: 87,568 shares
    • Indirect Holdings: None
    • 10b5-1 Plan Used? Yes

πŸ“„ Summary

Anderman Todd, Chief Legal Officer at OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC (OCUL), sold 11,132 shares on October 8, 2025, at an average price of $12.34, realizing proceeds of about ~$137,368.88. After the transaction, he now holds 87,568 shares directly; no indirect holdings reported. For retail traders, this is a neutral event: Routine sell-to-cover for tax withholding; not indicative of insider concern.

πŸ”‘ Interpretation

  • Type: Comp-related (sell-to-cover tied to RSU vesting; filing footnote indicates automatic instruction)
  • Disposition: Shares were sold immediately under an automatic sale instruction (not a discretionary sale)
  • Size Context: The sale of 11,132 shares represents roughly ~11.3% of the pre-transaction position (~98,700 shares pre-sale) β€” modest and consistent with tax-withholding rather than large-scale profit-taking
  • ATH Metric: The trade price ($12.34) does not appear to coincide with any clear all-time high or low signal; based on the transaction price relative to the stock's historical trading range through yesterday, this sale does not look opportunistically timed to an ATH or ATL
  • Outlier Check: Not unusually large given the reporting person's total holdings and the stated sell-to-cover purpose; consistent with routine transactions

πŸ“Š Bullish or Bearish?

Neutral.

Neutral. The filing shows a net sale (Code S) but the footnotes and 10b5-1/automatic sale language indicate a non-discretionary, compensation-related sell-to-cover event; the insider retains the majority of their position. Data is complete for this transaction but cluster activity cannot be determined from this filing alone.

βœ… Bottom Line (Retail Takeaway)

This transaction looks like a routine sell-to-cover for tax withholding rather than a bearish signal. For retail traders, it’s noise, not a tradeable event β€” not worth short-/mid-term action unless corroborated by larger, discretionary insider sales from multiple senior executives.